Showing posts with label Larry Jones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Larry Jones. Show all posts

Friday, February 8, 2013

Central Park NC Study Criticized As "Propaganda"


The Salisbury Post and Stanly News & Press provide a good recap of the Uwharrie Commission meeting on Wednesday night in Mocksville. The meeting included the presentation of a controversial study prepared for Central Park NC. 

Here is a brief excerpt from the articles:

Salisbury Post
Report details benefits if state takes control of Alcoa-operated dams on Yadkin

Supporters of Alcoa Inc. bristled at a report that showed local jobs and millions of dollars could be available if North Carolina claimed control of four Alcoa-owned dams on the Yadkin River. ...

Larry Jones, president of the High Rock Lake Association, and Ray Barham, Alcoa’s relicensing manager, both spoke against the report after the presentation Wednesday afternoon.

Jones criticized the board for spending taxpayer money on the report he described as “propaganda” that pushed the commission’s agenda.

“The report that I saw presented up here is full of incorrect information, erroneous information and information that was addressed long ago,” Jones said, adding he hadn’t yet had time to thoroughly examine the report.

Barham said the report was flawed in the premise that the state could still recapture the license. Legislation to address the issue previously died in the N.C. General Assembly.

Click here to read the entire article.


Stanly News & Press
Alcoa slams Uwharrie Yadkin study
Alcoa's Yadkin relicensing manager slammed a report funded by the Uwharrie Regional Resources Commission that seems to favor a recapturing of the Yadkin dams by the state and warned of a long legal fight if that action is attempted.

Commission Chairman Dr. Max Walser gave Ray Barham of ALCOA “three or four minutes in the interest of fairness” to respond to the report after the nearly hour-long presentation concluded.

“There’s not enough time to go into all the financial errors in these reports,” Barham said.

He said the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had never recaptured a project.

“They have already stated publicly in an environmental impact statement that recapturing is not an option on the Yadkin River,” Barham said.

“That don’t see it as being necessary and we’re already past the time permitted in the law before the license is up to be notified about recapturing.

“To continue down that path is really misleading and foolish. The state really shouldn’t be trying to look at controlling private dams and private property. It’s not what this commission is about. It’s not how you do economic development.”

He asked what would be next if the state began taking over private businesses.

“Would it be farm land or oceanfront property the state wants to turn into a casino or a hotel?” he asked.

“That’s the dangers you’re talking about when you bring up this issue.”

Barham said the reports overlook hundreds of years of federal law, common law and those regarding ownership rights in North Carolina and the United States.

“I think the Supreme Court rulings would be very different than what you’re hearing tonight,” he said.

“If it continues down this path, it’s a long and expensive legal fight that the state of North Carolina does not have the money at this point to engage in.

“I would think the money fighting over this would be better put in doing something real instead of some pipe dream.”

Barham argued that ALCOA has invested in economic development in Badin.

“We’ve spent $10 million trying to create jobs,” he said.

“We’re actually the only ones that have created jobs in the last few years versus this committee.”

He said the company would welcome the state commerce department to work with them in creating jobs instead of “chasing the pipe dream of a few.”


Monday, February 22, 2010

Another Misleading Attack from the Yadkin Riverkeeper...

The Yadkin Riverkeeper is at it again.  He attacked Larry Jones of the High Rock Lake Association last week, accusing him of a having a conflict of interest that compromised his advocacy for High Rock Lake during the relicensing process.

Anyone who was involved in the relicensing negotiations knows just how absurd that claim is.  Larry Jones was, and continues to be, one of the strongest advocates that High Rock Lake has ever known.

The Yadkin Riverkeeper’s allegations stem from a property agreement that APGI made with Larry Jones in October 2009.  Larry received ownership of the driveway to his home and property in exchange for his agreement to relinquish all pasture, cultivation and water withdrawal rights. 

Marshall Olson, environmental and natural resources manager at APGI, said the agreement offers important environmental benefits for High Rock Lake because it will reduce the potential for fertilizer in the lake and reduce erosion along the shoreline.

The High Rock Lake Association released a statement this weekend condemning the Yadkin Riverkeeper’s attacks and reiterating its support for the Relicensing Settlement Agreement.

“No one has or is fighting harder for the users of High Rock Lake and the rest of the Yadkin Project than Larry Jones and the Association,” the statement says.  “When the license is issued by FERC, we will have a binding agreement to operate the Yadkin Project for the benefit of all stakeholders. Jones, under the direction of the Association, was a primary negotiator to get these desired changes.”

“There is nothing wrong with the actions of Larry Jones, either in his capacity as an officer of the HRLA or in the manner he has conducted his personal affairs.”

Marshall Olson shared a similar perspective:

“Alcoa’s dealings with Larry Jones and his property have been straightforward and unrelated to his role with the High Rock Lake Association.  This transaction took place more than 2½ years after the High Rock Lake Association signed the Relicensing Settlement Agreement in support of a new license for Alcoa, and with the full knowledge and support of the High Rock Lake Association’s Board of Directors,” Olson said.  “Routinely, Alcoa must address issues involving historical easements and property line issues, such as those with Larry Jones, and this transaction is no different from the others.” 

This latest attack from the Yadkin Riverkeeper has absolutely no merit.  It is simply another attempt to drum up support for a costly government takeover of the Yadkin Project.  

Thursday, April 16, 2009

High Rock Lake Association speaks out against state takeover

The High Rock Lake Association’s Board of Directors has unanimously voted to oppose North Carolina’s effort to take Alcoa’s privately-owned hydroelectric business and Gov. Perdue’s motion to intervene in the relicensing of the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project.  You can read about it here in the Lexington Dispatch: Lake group challenges state proposal on Alcoa and the Stanly News & Press: HRLA opposes bill, favors Alcoa.

A press release cited the association’s concern with the continued delay in the relicensing process, the State’s disregard for the established relicensing process in which the association actively participated and the burden on North Carolina taxpayers that would result from a government takeover.

The entire press release is posted below:

High Rock Lake Association Challenges State Proposal

LEXINGTON, NC – At a meeting this week of the High Rock Lake Association (HRLA), their Board of Directors unanimously approved a motion to take issue with North Carolina’s unprecedented proposal to take over the “Yadkin Project,” Alcoa’s power generation facilities and reservoirs on the Yadkin River.

In a written review of the proposed Senate Bill 967, Larry Jones, President of HRLA, pointed out that there are several areas that demand explanations from our legislators, including causing further delays in the license renewal process, lack of legal precedent, loss of county tax revenues, adding to the NC taxpayer’s burden, assuming responsibility for pollution abatement, destroying the “business friendly” reputation of NC, and ignoring circumventing normal requirements of accountability and transparency in creating a new “authority.”  

The HRLA Board also voted to object to Governor Perdue’s motion to FERC to intervene in the Relicensing process. After conscientiously and publicly negotiating for over six years with Alcoa (APGI), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and the many other stakeholders on the Yadkin River Basin to arrive at the pending, detailed Relicensing Settlement Agreement (RSA) under FERC’s relicensing procedures, it is extremely disappointing to HRLA and its’ 1,500+ members to suddenly hear the State call for an “emergency hearing” to hear a motion to “allow intervention out of time”! 

The state is also claiming that “the Governor is doing no more than implementing the will of the electorate and is deserving of deference on matters of timing….”! This is despite the fact that the NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission have been involved in the process since 2002. The Governors’ actions, in the opinion of the HRLA, do not reflect the will of the people.

HRLA believes that these lakes are one of the crown jewels of NC providing environmental, recreational, economic, and aesthetic benefits.  We encourage everyone to study SB 967 and consider the questions it raises.

For further information, and a review of SB967, please see the HRLA website.