Thursday, November 19, 2009

Alcoa requests permit modification

To ensure that it continues to comply with environmental regulations at the Badin Works aluminum smelter, Alcoa has submitted a request to the N.C. Department of Environment & Natural Resources to modify its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.

Alcoa is requesting to redirect stormwater from a small ½ acre site within the Badin Works property to another stormwater discharge outfall. With this modification, Alcoa is confident that fluoride levels in stormwater entering Badin Lake will remain below the allowable limits. No new or increased flows or fluoride levels in the stormwater discharge from Badin Works are being requested.

Fluoride is a naturally occurring chemical that is used in the aluminum manufacturing process and waste containing fluoride was previously stored on the Badin Works property. As part of the remediation process at Badin Works, Alcoa removed this waste and the underlying soil from the ½ acre site in 1994 and disposed of it an appropriate industrial landfill.

Stormwater runoff from this ½ acre site contains low levels of fluoride, but does not pose any risk to people who use Badin Lake (swimmers or fisherman) or to the wildlife or aquatic life in Badin Lake. Monitoring shows that fluoride levels are typically within the limits set by US Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water.

As part of its environmental responsibility, Alcoa is continually looking at ways to reduce fluoride levels. During the past two years, Alcoa has spent more than $180,000 to identify and reduce the amount of fluoride in stormwater. These efforts have included a variety of steps, including but not limited to:

• Simulating rain events and collecting soil, sediment and water samples to better determine the source of fluoride.

• Minimizing contact between stormwater and surface soils by installing new liners in drainage channels, roadways and parking areas, then covering those areas with stone.

Background on Fluoride

Fluorides are naturally occurring compounds that are often added to drinking water supplies and a variety of dental products, including toothpaste and mouth rinses, to help prevent dental cavities. Small amounts of fluoride are beneficial. Over time, ingestion of very high levels of fluoride in drinking water may cause brittle bones in children and adults and mottled teeth in children.

For the prevention of dental decay, the Public Health Service has recommended since 1962 that public water supplies contain between 0.7 and 1.2 milligrams of fluoride per liter of drinking water. The Environmental Protection Agency has set a maximum amount of fluoride allowable in drinking water of 4.0 milligrams per liter of water.

The NPDES permit places limits on fluoride levels coming from a portion of the Badin Works plant to 1.8 milligrams per liter, even though these discharges are located far from drinking water withdrawals.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Alcoa asks FERC to reconsider ruling on state water quality permit

Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI) has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to reconsider its October 15th order finding that the State of North Carolina acted within the required timeframe when it issued a water quality certificate for the Yadkin Project.

In a legal filing on November 13, APGI argues that FERC erred by determining that a state can withhold the effectiveness of a water quality certificate beyond the statutory one-year deadline. In this case, the water quality certificate issued for the Yadkin Project on May 7, 2009 was not effective within the one-year timeframe specified by law, as expressly stated in the certificate, and required additional action before becoming effective.

APGI emphasized that it is not challenging or objecting to the conditions in the water quality certificate that closely mirror the environmental provisions in the Relicensing Settlement Agreement.

“We remain committed to improving water quality in the Yadkin River and stand behind the significant environmental protections that are included in the Relicensing Settlement Agreement,” said Gene Ellis. “We have asked FERC to reconsider its October 15th order because it was unsupported by legal conclusions and inconsistent with the Clean Water Act and FERC’s own regulations.”

Friday, November 6, 2009

The Yadkin Riverkeeper gets it wrong... again

The Yadkin Riverkeeper said today that he has recently “discovered” internal Alcoa documents from 1997 that suggest Alcoa tried to hide information about possible contamination in Badin Lake.

The truth of the matter – Alcoa openly shared information about the presence of PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in Badin Lake with state agencies, local government officials and the media in May 1997. It gave a presentation to health officials and government leaders on May 16, 1997 and a story about Alcoa’s testing was reported on the front page of the Stanly News & Press on May 18, 1997.

The voluntary testing, conducted in April 1997, indicated PAHs in the sediment 20-30 feet below the surface of Badin Lake. Luanne Williams, a toxicologist with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, reviewed the test results and indicated that the PAH levels in the swimming cove at Badin Lake were “comparable to concentrations found in urban soil” and “should not pose a significant health risk.” The N.C. Division of Public Health indicated then it was safe to swim in Badin Lake and confirmed that in early 2009 when it said, “It is safe to boat, wade, swim and do other activities in the water. Skin contact with the water or sediment does not represent a health risk.”

During the past 12 years, Alcoa has continued to monitor the sediment in Badin Lake and a 2008 study showed these sediments remain isolated and are not spreading to other parts of the lake.

Alcoa was commended by Stanly County officials, including county manager John Whitehurst and health director Barry Bass, in the Stanly News & Press’s 1997 article for sharing the information with the public.

“I commend (Alcoa) for proactively handling this information and for the way they worked with the state to determine the significance of the information,” Bass said.

Now, Yadkin Riverkeeper Dean Naujoks is trying to say that Alcoa’s behavior “indicates a pattern of deceit regarding its environmental record…”

But the facts show just the oppositeagain.

Alcoa awarded $13 million grant to modernize hydro project in western North Carolina

The U.S. Department of Energy announced Wednesday that it has awarded $30.6 million in economic stimulus funds to help modernize seven hydroelectric projects, including an Alcoa operation in western North Carolina. The grant demonstrates the federal government’s confidence in Alcoa’s long-standing ability to generate clean, renewable energy from its hydroelectric plants.

Alcoa will receive up to $13 million to replace four 90-year-old turbines at the Tapoco Project, located along the Little Tennessee River. The Tapoco Project includes four dams – two in western North Carolina and two in Tennessee – that supply power to an aluminum smelter in Alcoa, Tennessee.

The installation of new high-efficiency turbines is expected to increase power generation by 23 percent. U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said the investment will help the United States generate more renewable energy without building new dams.

Alcoa has begun making similar upgrades to the Yadkin Project in central North Carolina. Alcoa has not received any stimulus money for those upgrades.

For more information, read John Murawski’s report in The News & Observer.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Alcoa responds to FERC ruling

Today, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) determined that the State of North Carolina acted within the one year timeline to issue a required water quality certificate for the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project. Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI) had argued that the State waived its rights by failing to issue an effective certificate within one year.

FERC continues to have the ability to issue a new long-term license based on the water quality certificate that was issued by the NC Division of Water Quality on May 8, 2009.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Responding to misinformation from the Yadkin Riverkeeper

The Yadkin Riverkeeper issued a press release Friday containing false and misleading information about APGI’s efforts to clean up a small area near the Narrows Dam in Montgomery County.

To set the record straight:

APGI is performing work to remediate about a 1/4 acre site where two discarded capacitors were discovered and removed in 2002. As a precaution, APGI is removing a small, isolated amount of sediment from behind the Narrows powerhouse. All work is being done with the knowledge and approval of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

The Yadkin Riverkeeper’s allegation that this work involves PCB contaminants associated with Alcoa’s Badin Works that are traveling downstream from Badin Lake is patently untrue. This work is related to capacitors that were previously removed and represents the final step in the remediation process. The sediment being removed is isolated from Badin Lake.

The improvements being made to the Falls Boat Access Area is separate from the cleanup effort and is solely to enhance public recreational access.

The misinformation being spread by the Yadkin Riverkeeper represents an irresponsible pattern of behavior we have witnessed all too many times recently.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Why Perdue's proposed Yadkin River takeover is so flawed

The Charlotte Observer published an opinion piece today from Rick Bowen, president of Alcoa's energy operations, about Gov. Perdue's attempted government takeover of the Yadkin Project.

Why Perdue's proposed Yadkin River takeover is so flawed

From Rick Bowen, president of Alcoa Energy

When Gov. Bev Perdue decided to pursue an unprecedented government takeover of Alcoa Power Generating Inc.'s hydropower operations along the Yadkin River, she ignored the recommendations of experts in her own state agency, disregarded the actions of the N.C. General Assembly and refused to listen to the citizens who will be most impacted by a takeover.

Instead, she asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to toss aside its own rules and regulations and recommend a government takeover of the Yadkin Project.

Nothing like that has ever been done before... at least not in America.

Gov. Perdue's quest to take our private property stands in stark contrast to the actions of the General Assembly, which rejected takeover legislation this year, and the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, which studied our operations and in 2007 signed the Relicensing Settlement Agreement supporting a new license for the Yadkin Project.

From the beginning, Gov. Perdue has turned a deaf ear toward the citizens most involved in this process, including homeowners, recreational users, business groups, environmental groups and others who spent years negotiating a relicensing settlement agreement with APGI that offers substantial benefits to North Carolina.

She has dismissed the recommendation of FERC staff that our license should be renewed.

And she ignored the concerns of interested citizens, including grassroots groups such as the N.C. Property Rights Coalition, who have expressed concern that this takeover will set a dangerous precedent that could impact private citizens and small business owners. You have to believe it will affect the way other business owners look at North Carolina, too.

I wish I could ask Gov. Perdue why she is so intent on taking our business. But she has refused to meet with me and others from Alcoa.

So I can't ask her why she conveniently omitted or distorted our history of environmental stewardship and community support. I can't explain that her actions reflect a clear misinterpretation of the Federal Power Act. And I can't point out the glaring errors in her filing.

For example, Gov. Perdue's projections estimate $2.8 million a year for operating and maintenance expenses - but fail to take into account any expenses associated with project land management, depreciation, other contracted costs, power substation and transmission, and general administrative expenses. Those expenses add an additional $11 million a year to the operating costs, meaning Gov. Perdue has underestimated operating expenses by almost 400 percent.

She also estimates it will cost $24.1 million to acquire the Yadkin Project. Even if a government takeover were possible, the price must reflect the updated cost of Alcoa's net investment ($91 million), plus severance damages that could add hundreds of millions of dollars to the cost.

Gov. Perdue argues that North Carolina must "secure a greater degree of control over the water supplies within its own borders." If so, then shouldn't the same rules apply to all rivers in North Carolina and all private hydro operators?

But this battle isn't about protecting the North Carolina's water supplies; it's about taking government control of a private business.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Alcoa responds to NC Governor’s attempts to take the Yadkin Project

I wanted to share with you a press release we issued this morning about our response to Gov. Perdue's Sept. 18 filing with FERC. We filed a formal response yesterday, which you can access here.

Alcoa responds to NC Governor’s attempts to take the Yadkin Project

Company criticizes NC Gov. Bev Perdue’s attempt to circumvent federal law and take its private property

BADIN, NC (October 6, 2009) – Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (APGI), a subsidiary of Alcoa Inc., responded to an unprecedented effort by N.C. Gov. Bev Perdue to seize control of its privately-owned hydropower business along the Yadkin River by filing a formal response with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Monday. In a September 18 filing, Gov. Perdue asked FERC to ignore its long-standing rules and regulations, disregard the findings of the state’s own environmental agencies and deny APGI a new federal license to continue generating clean, renewable energy.

“Gov. Perdue is asking FERC to ignore federal law and allow the state to take over a private business that has been a part of the North Carolina business community since 1915. It’s something that has never been done before and with good reason,” said Rick Bowen, president of Alcoa’s energy operations. “We hope that FERC will uphold the intent of the Federal Power Act and promptly reject Gov. Perdue’s effort to circumvent the law and take our property.”

In its response, Alcoa criticizes Gov. Perdue’s zealous pursuit of the company’s business and property. It provides details that show her September 18 filing is fraught with inaccuracies and reflects a clear misinterpretation of the Federal Power Act.

In addition, Gov. Perdue’s actions show a complete disregard for FERC’s rules and regulations. Her request for a government takeover comes three years after deadlines specified in the Federal Power Act and flies in the face of FERC’s April 2009 ruling that, as a late intervener, Gov. Perdue must accept the existing relicensing record.

A complete copy of Alcoa’s response is available on the FERC web site at: http://elibrary.FERC.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20091005-5146

Gov. Perdue’s Takeover Effort Raises Questions

To make her case, Gov. Perdue has conveniently omitted or purposefully distorted Alcoa’s history of responsible environmental stewardship and community support.

“It is disappointing that Gov. Perdue would make such accusations without the supporting facts of the state agencies,” Bowen said. “I wish Gov. Perdue would have given us the courtesy of a meeting with her so we could have addressed some of these issues when she first took office. She has yet to accept a meeting with our representatives.”

The most glaring inaccuracies in Gov. Perdue’s filing involve the misrepresentation of Alcoa’s environmental record and flawed financial projections that grossly underestimate how much it would cost the State of North Carolina to acquire and operate the Yadkin Project.

Environmental Issues: Alcoa and APGI follow all environmental regulations in North Carolina. If Gov. Perdue believes the company has failed to meet any of its environmental responsibilities or delayed taking any necessary action, she already has full regulatory authority over its waste sites.

While Gov. Perdue claims that “pollutants from former industrial operations at the Badin Works site remain a threat to human health and environment,” the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has stated on the record that the sites do not pose a threat to public health or the environment. The company is committed to continue testing and monitoring these sites and is legally bound to make sure they don’t create any environmental concerns in the future.

Financial Projections: Gov. Perdue’s financial projections include glaring errors and omissions. She has projected $2.8 million a year for operating and maintenance expenses but failed to take into account expenses associated with project land management, depreciation, other contracted costs, power substation and transmission, and general administrative expenses. Those expenses – which add an additional $11 million a year to the operating costs – demonstrate that Gov. Perdue has underestimated operating expenses by almost 400%.

In addition, the financial projections reflect a price of $24.1 million to acquire the Yadkin Project. Even if a government takeover were possible, the price would include the updated cost of Alcoa’s net investment ($91 million), plus severance damages. Alcoa believes severance damages alone could be hundreds of millions of dollars.

Gov. Perdue’s relentless attacks on Alcoa stand in stark contrast to the actions of the N.C. General Assembly and her own N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and show a disregard for the 23 organizations who negotiated a relicensing settlement agreement with Alcoa that offers substantial benefits to North Carolina.

Consider:

• A bipartisan group of legislators in the N.C. House voted in overwhelming numbers (66-39) to defeat takeover legislation supported by Gov. Perdue. (August 2009 vote on SB 967)

• The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources has closely studied every aspect of Alcoa’s operations – including water quality, water resources and waste management issues – and support granting a new license for APGI. The Division of Water Quality issued APGI a required water quality certificate in May that clears the way for FERC to issue a new license, and the Division of Waste Management has said that waste sites on Alcoa’s other industrial property do not pose a health risk.

• A collection of 23 organizations – representing state and federal agencies, local homeowners, recreational users and business organizations, environmental interest groups and other stakeholders – negotiated and signed a relicensing settlement agreement that supports a new license for Alcoa.

Grassroots organizations such as the N.C. Property Rights Coalition have expressed strong opposition to Gov. Perdue’s attempts to take Alcoa’s private property, raising concern that private citizens and small business owners may be subject to the same type of government takeover.

• 82% of North Carolina voters oppose the state taking over a privately-owned business (Public opinion poll of 600 likely voters conducted in May 2009 by McLaughlin & Associates)

Despite these factors, Gov. Perdue and Commerce Secretary Keith Crisco continue to relentlessly pursue a takeover of Alcoa’s hydropower business. In fact, Gov. Perdue has even supported a lawsuit against her own Department of Environment and Natural Resources over the issuing of the water quality certificate for the Yadkin Project.

Alcoa believes FERC, the federal agency that regulates all hydropower projects in the United States, should dismiss Gov. Perdue’s motion and issue the company a new long-term license for the Yadkin Project. FERC staff has already recommended a new license for Alcoa, and the agency has all of the information it needs to make a final decision regarding a new license.

# # #

Monday, September 21, 2009

Alcoa responds to State of North Carolina's FERC Filing

On behalf of Gov. Beverly Perdue, the State of North Carolina filed a motion at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, September 18. The filing presents North Carolina’s case for a federal takeover of the privately-owned Yadkin Hydroelectric Project in central North Carolina. Alcoa, which has owned and operated the Yadkin Project since 1917, is currently reviewing the State of North Carolina’s filing. The company has released the following statement to share its initial reaction:

We are disappointed that Gov. Perdue continues to pursue an unprecedented government takeover of Alcoa’s privately-owned hydroelectric business, despite public and legislative opposition to her efforts.

The N.C. General Assembly rejected the idea of a government takeover in August 2009 when the N.C. House voted overwhelmingly to defeat the Yadkin Trust Bill (SB 967). In addition, a public opinion poll conducted in May 2009 found that 81 percent of North Carolina voters oppose a government takeover of the Yadkin Project. The anticipated cost of a government takeover – which could be $500 million or more – and the dangerous precedent of taking private property have concerned taxpayers and legislators alike.

Alcoa believes that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has all of the information it needs to issue a new long-term license for the Yadkin Project and encourages FERC to do so. Gov. Perdue’s efforts demonstrate a complete disregard for the well-established federal relicensing process that Alcoa has followed since 2002.

Alcoa worked closely with stakeholders interested in the future management of the Yadkin River – including state agencies representing the State of North Carolina – to negotiate a relicensing agreement that has the widespread support of local governments, lakefront property owners, recreational users, business groups, environmental organizations and many others. In addition, FERC staff recommended a new long-term license for Alcoa after a comprehensive two-year review of all relevant issues.

The relicensing agreement offers significant benefits for North Carolina that are being delayed by Gov. Perdue’s actions. These benefits include improved water quality in the Yadkin River; increased water withdrawals by local municipalities; better protection of water during drought conditions; thousands of acres for long-term land protection; the creation of new parks, public swim areas and other recreation opportunities; more stable lake levels and a consistent downstream flow of water; more flexibility regarding shoreline development for lakefront property owner.

Alcoa looks forward to receiving a new license and implementing the many positive benefits the relicensing agreement will bring to the people of North Carolina.

# # #

Footnotes:

On August 6, the N.C. House voted 66-39 to defeat Senate Bill 967 (known as the Yadkin Trust bill). The bill would have established a state trust with the authority to seize the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project

McLaughlin & Associates, a respected national pollster, conducted a public opinion poll of 700 likely North Carolina voters on May 17-18, 2009. The poll found that 81 percent of voters disapproved of the state government using taxpayer money to take over a privately owned and operated business.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Dow Jones recognizes Alcoa as a global leader in sustainability

Alcoa has been named a component of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for the eighth consecutive year – an achievement that recognizes the company’s leadership and commitment to sustainability. The Dow Jones Sustainability Index follows a best-in-class approach and includes sustainability leaders from industries worldwide. Selection is based on a thorough analysis of a company’s economic, environmental and social performance.

“To be included on this key index for eight years in a row clearly shows that Alcoa’s commitment to sustainability remains strong. We produce the ideal sustainable material – aluminum is lightweight and infinitely recyclable, and it will continue to play a key role in the sustainable life of our planet,” said Alcoa CEO and President Klaus Kleinfeld.

Some of Alcoa’s most noteworthy sustainability achievements in 2008 include:

(1) A 36% reduction in greenhouse gases from the 1990 base year – a 44% improvement over Alcoa’s target for 2010.

(2) Approximately 90% of Alcoa’s worldwide operations have community programs, putting the company within reach of its target of 100% by 2010; and

(3) Alcoa has been ranked by the Covalence Ethics Index sixth in ethical reputation among all companies worldwide and first in the Resources category.

You can learn more about Alcoa’s sustainability efforts by downloading a copy of Alcoa’s 2008 Sustainability Report.

Friday, August 7, 2009

NC House rejects government takeover of Alcoa property in decisive vote

A great victory at the North Carolina General Assembly last night. See press release below:

NC House rejects government takeover of Alcoa property in decisive vote

N.C. RALEIGH – The N.C. House voted in overwhelming numbers to reject an unprecedented and costly government takeover of Alcoa’s hydroelectric business along the Yadkin River in central North Carolina. Senate Bill 967, sponsored by Sen. Fletcher Hartsell, failed in a floor vote by a wide margin, 66-39, with bipartisan support.

“Legislators sent a clear message that they do not support the taking of private business. The more they learned about this issue, it became evident that passing this legislation would set a dangerous precedent for North Carolina,” said Gene Ellis, an Alcoa spokesman. “We appreciate the strong support of the N.C. House and remain committed to fighting any future efforts by Gov. Perdue to take our business against our will.”

The bill would have established a state trust with the authority to seize the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, a privately-owned business that has been generating clean renewable energy in North Carolina since 1915.

Legislators tried to quickly maneuver the bill through the General Assembly this week after the House Water Resources Committee reversed itself and voted the bill out of committee. The bill was heard twice Thursday by the House Public Utilities Committee, which passed the bill at a hastily called afternoon meeting. The bill then bypassed the House Finance Committee and was sent straight to the House floor.

Opponents of a state takeover –including lakefront homeowners, property rights advocates and local officials in Stanly County – expressed serious concerns about the proposed takeover this week. Their concerns included the potential cost to North Carolina taxpayers of $500 million or more; the fundamental violation of Alcoa’s private property rights; and the need to support the federal licensing process and the Relicensing Settlement Agreement that Alcoa reached with stakeholders.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the federal agency that regulates hydroelectric projects in the United States, has all of the information it needs to issue a new long-term license for the Yadkin Project. FERC staff has already recommended issuing a new license to Alcoa.

“We remain eager for a new license and look forward to implementing the many positive benefits included in the Relicensing Settlement Agreement,” Ellis said.

Under the terms of the relicensing agreement, Alcoa will continue to improve water quality in the Yadkin River; allow for increased water withdrawals by local municipalities; better protect the water supply when drought conditions are present; set aside thousands of acres for long-term land protection; create new parks, public swim areas and other recreation opportunities; provide more stable lake levels and a consistent downstream flow of water; and give homeowners more flexibility regarding shoreline development.

###

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

The Battle Intensifies: House committee passes takeover bill; Sen. Hartsell maneuvers for quick floor vote

You never know what’s going to happen when you’re at the legislature. And Wednesday was one of the most surreal days I’ve ever experienced.

One week after a N.C. House Committee voted against a government takeover of the Alcoa’s Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, that same committee resurrected the bill and voted 8-7 to support an unprecedented government takeover that could cost North Carolina taxpayers more than $500 million.

The House Water Resources & Infrastructure Committee narrowly approved Senate Bill 967 despite the anticipated cost and strong opposition from lakefront homeowners, property rights advocates and local officials in Stanly County.

Within hours, Sen. Fletcher Hartsell began maneuvering the bill for a quick passage in both chambers. He amended an existing bill (House Bill 1099) to include the essence of SB 967 that creates the Yadkin Trust. The bill passed the Senate and was sent by special delivery to the House for a floor vote that could occur as early as tomorrow, effectively bypassing the House Public Utilities and House Finance committees.

At the same time, SB 967 was referred to the House Public Utilities Commission for a hearing on Thursday at 10am. This essentially gives the bill's supporters two different cracks at passing the Yadkin Trust bill. If SB 967 is defeated in committee, the full House can still pass HB 1099.

“Sen. Hartsell pulled out all the stops today. It looks like he’s willing to do whatever it takes to take away the business we started here in 1915,” said Gene Ellis, a spokesman for Alcoa. “Frankly, we’re stunned that this important legislation is being rammed through the legislature. This is a complex issue with far-reaching implications and it deserves a fair hearing.”

Alcoa will continue fighting to keep the Yadkin Project, which has generated clean, renewable energy in North Carolina for nearly 100 years. It is important to remember that regardless of what happens in the North Carolina legislature, only the federal government can consider a takeover of the Yadkin Project, Ellis said.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has all of the information it needs to issue a new long-term license for the Yadkin Project. FERC staff has already dismissed the possibility of a government takeover and recommended issuing a new license to Alcoa.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

House committee to discuss takeover bill again; Meeting scheduled for Wed at 2pm

One week after voting against Senate Bill 967, the N.C. House Water Resources & Infrastructure Committee will reconsider a government takeover of the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project that could cost North Carolina $500 million or more.

The meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 5 at 2:00 pm in Room 1228 of the Legislative Building.

Please take a moment to call members of the committee and remind them why they should oppose this bill. Here is a list of members:

Rep. Lucy Allen: 919-733-5860, lucy.allen@ncleg.net

Rep. Hugh Blackwell: 919-733-5805, hugh.blackwell@ncleg.net

Rep. Jamie Boles: 919-733-5903, Jamie.Boles@ncleg.net

Rep. Edith Warren: 919-715-3023, edith.warren@ncleg.net

Rep. Pryor Gibson:919-715-3007, pryor.gibson@ncleg.net

Rep. Mitch Gillespie: 919-733-5862, mitchg@ncleg.net

Rep. Bruce Goforth: 919-733-5746, bruce.goforth@ncleg.net

Rep. Carolyn Justice: 919-715-9664, carolyn.justice@ncleg.net

Rep. Kelly Alexander: 919-733-5778, kelly.alexander@ncleg.net

Rep. Grey Mills: 919-733-5741, grey.mills@ncleg.net

Rep. Bill Owens: 919-733-0010, bill.owens@ncleg.net

Rep. Ray Warren: 919-715-8361, ray.warren@ncleg.net

Rep. Ruth Samuelson: 919-715-3009, ruth.samuelson@ncleg.net

Rep. Cullie Tarleton, Chair: 919-733-7727, cullie.tarleton@ncleg.net

Rep. Alice Underhill: 919-733-5853, alice.underhill@ncleg.net

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

N.C. House Committee votes against government takeover of Alcoa’s Yadkin Project

Here is a copy of a press release we issued this evening about today's committee vote in the N.C. House.

N.C. House Committee votes against government takeover of Alcoa’s Yadkin Project

RALEIGH (July 28, 2009) – A legislative bid to pursue a government takeover of Alcoa’s Yadkin Hydroelectric Project was thwarted by a N.C. House committee today. The Water Resources and Infrastructure Committee voted 8-6 against allowing Senate Bill 967 to move forward.

“We applaud the committee for standing up for private property rights and voting against an unprecedented government takeover that could have cost North Carolina $500 million or more,” said Gene Ellis, a spokesperson for Alcoa. “We remain eager for a new license and look forward to implementing the many positive benefits included in the Relicensing Settlement Agreement.”

Under the terms of the relicensing agreement, Alcoa will:

Continue to improve water quality in the Yadkin River

Allow for increased water withdrawals by local municipalities

Better protect the water supply when drought conditions are present

Set aside thousands of acres for long-term land protection

Create new parks, public swim areas and other recreation opportunities

Provide more stable lake levels and a consistent downstream flow of water

Give homeowners more flexibility regarding shoreline development

FERC staff has already recommended issuing a new long-term license to Alcoa.

“We are gratified that the House took the time to carefully consider this legislation and weigh the pros and cons. Once they did that, they voted their conscience,” said Larry Jones, president of the High Rock Lake Association. Jones addressed the committee on behalf of more than 1,000 lakefront property owners, including approximately 50 members who attended the committee meeting.

Since planting roots in North Carolina in 1915, Alcoa has been a strong supporter of the local community. Together, Alcoa and Alcoa Foundation have donated $3 million to support non-profit organizations to improve economic development, education, recreation, public safety and more.

# # #