David Stickler: Clean Tech did its best

The Winston-Salem Journal published a guest column today from David Stickler, a member of Clean Tech's Board of Directors, about why the company was unable to reach an agreement with the Stanly County Commissioners.

"If there had been true interest by Stanly County in finding a path forward, I feel certain that Clean Tech and Alcoa could have mitigated all of the concerns that were raised — even those raised at the 11th hour," Stickler wrote

"But there was one fundamental problem: Every time we mitigated or structured around one concern, the county would simply present another concern that then needed to be addressed."

The entire article is reprinted below:

Clean Tech did its best

By DAVID STICKLER

Now that Clean Tech has abandoned its plans to build a $300 million manufacturing plant and create 450 new jobs in Stanly County, I see that there is already a lot of finger-pointing in the press about why we were unable to reach an agreement with the Stanly County commissioners. Having been directly involved in the process of trying to structure a transaction that met the county's concerns, let me share my perspective.

If there had been true interest by Stanly County in finding a path forward, I feel certain that Clean Tech and Alcoa could have mitigated all of the concerns that were raised — even those raised at the 11th hour.

But there was one fundamental problem: Every time we mitigated or structured around one concern, the county would simply present another concern that then needed to be addressed.

First it was environmental. Then it was jobs. Then it was the number of jobs. Then it was the length of the jobs commitment.

In a final effort to reach an agreement Thursday evening, Clean Tech teamed with Alcoa and committed to creating 750 jobs with a payroll and benefits commitment that started at $30 million a year and increased over time to more than $43 million a year. The commitment would have lasted 50 years.

But even after these commitments were put on the table and the previously identified concerns addressed, the county began raising new obstacles, some of which involved the most unlikely of business scenarios. So I asked the county directly: If we can resolve these latest concerns, will you create a path forward? Unfortunately, the response received led Clean Tech to conclude that there would always be one more challenge to overcome and that the process would never end.

At that point, Clean Tech finally had to say enough is enough. We had tried our best.

Issues surrounding the relicensing of Alcoa's dams were obviously a major sticking point for the county. It is important for everyone to know that Clean Tech never tried to infringe on Stanly County's or North Carolina's legal standing with respect to having a voice at the table regarding permits, 401 certificates or government authorizations. All Clean Tech was looking for was an assurance that the county and the state would allow the regulatory process to move forward in a timely manner so that we could begin the construction and hiring process.

As we prepare to move forward with our plans to locate the Clean Tech plant in another state, I feel terrible for the citizens of Badin and Stanly County who would have benefited from the investment that Clean Tech was trying to make. The support of the citizens for the Clean Tech project was overwhelming. I am sorry that things did not work out differently.

Commissioners walk away from deal to bring $300M investment, 450 jobs to Stanly County

Alcoa remains committed to attracting new jobs to Badin, obtaining new hydro license for Yadkin Project

  

Stanly County Commissioners failed to agree on a plan to bring a $300 million investment and 450 new jobs to the County, effectively walking away from a one of the largest economic development projects in the county’s history. 

Clean Tech Silicon & Bar LLC, led by former Nucor CEO John Correnti, had set a December 15 deadline for the company to reach an agreement with Stanly County that would have allowed the silicon and rebar manufacturing plant to move forward. After several meetings this week, the Commissioners failed to reach agreement with Alcoa and Clean Tech. 

“Opportunities like this don’t come along very often, and it’s incredibly disappointing that these 450 new jobs will not be coming to North Carolina,” said Kevin Anton, Alcoa’s Chief Sustainability Officer and the executive responsible for the Company’s recruitment of Clean Tech. 

Despite the obstacles that forced Clean Tech to abandon its plans in Stanly County, Anton says Alcoa will continue working to bring other businesses to town. 

“Alcoa remains committed to attracting new jobs to the Badin Business Park. We will follow through on our plans to improve water quality and protect the environment, and we will continue to vigorously pursue a new license for the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project,” Anton said. “Our goals remain the same, no matter how long it takes to reach them.”  

Recruiting Clean Tech

Alcoa began discussions with Clean Tech this summer, and the prospect of bringing hundreds of new jobs to Stanly County excited residents. Local elected officials and community leaders organized a “rally for jobs” in October that drew a crowd of 750 people. 

“The support of Mayor Harrison, Mayor Whitley, and other community leaders was overwhelming,” Anton said. “We appreciate the support of so many local residents and will continue working on their behalf to bring new jobs to Badin.” 

Alcoa offered a substantial package to Clean Tech as part of its recruitment efforts, including a commitment to invest in the company and purchase silicon for aluminum alloying. In addition, Alcoa offered economic incentives that would allow Clean Tech to obtain affordable power.    

Alcoa could only afford to offer those incentives if it obtains a new hydro license for the Yadkin Project, which it has owned and operated for nearly 100 years. Stanly County officials have delayed the relicensing with various legal challenges.  

Alcoa proposed a settlement to Stanly County in exchange for dropping its legal challenges and paving the way for Clean Tech to invest in Stanly County. The Company committed to attract approximately 750 new jobs within four years and attract $400 million in investments in the next five years — measures that would have spurred local spending and generated millions in new tax revenue. In addition, Alcoa pledged to contribute $6 million to Stanly County for education and other needs over the next two years.  

To address concerns that the jobs and investment would not materialize, Alcoa provided financial assurances that could generate more than $50 million for economic development in the region if Alcoa failed to meet its commitments.  

“We made our best effort to reach an agreement that would have an immediate, positive impact on the local economy and put these issues to rest,” Anton said. “Instead, it looks this process will continue for years to come.”  

Redeveloping the Badin Site

Alcoa has been working diligently to attract new jobs to Stanly County. Beginning in February, the company accelerated its plans to redevelop the former Badin aluminum smelter. It invested $10 million to turn the plant into the Badin Business Park and aggressively reached out to customers and business partners as part of its efforts to bring new jobs to North Carolina. 

Earlier this year, Alcoa successfully recruited Electronic Recyclers International, the nation’s largest electronic recycling company, to Badin. ERI began hiring this summer and will move into a larger, newly renovated facility early next year that will employ 200 people. Alcoa invested $5 million in building renovations to accommodate ERI.     

“The Badin Business Park is a great manufacturing site that is ready to come to life,” Anton said. “Clean Tech was an ideal fit in many respects, but we remain committed to redeveloping the Badin site and will continue to recruit companies to locate at the Badin Business Park.”  

Who is Clean Tech?

Who is Clean Tech? That's a question that has been on the minds of a lot of folks in Stanly County recently.

The Stanly News & Press recently printed a profile of Clean Tech. Some of the highlights:

• Clean Tech is led by a management team and investor group that has extensive experience building and operating industrial facilities across the United States.  Over the past 30 years, Clean Tech’s management and investment sponsors have helped create more than 10,000 jobs and invested billions of dollars in various projects in support of modernizing industrial America.  
• Clean Tech prides itself on (i) purchasing and installing the very best technology and equipment available, (ii) spending substantial amounts of time and money on employee training, and (iii) creating a compensation system that allows for wages well above the base wage level.  
• Projects include a $1 billion of scrap metal recycling investments in Arkansas; a $350-million “green renewable” investment in Hertford County, NC when Gov. Jim Hunt was leading efforts to create advanced manufacturing jobs; and an $880-million steel mill investment in Mississippi that created 450 jobs with guaranteed average annual wages of $53,000 per year.  (In some years, average annual wages exceeded $90,000.)

Clean Tech wants to make a $300-million industrial investment in Badin, North Carolina that would create 250 direct jobs (average annual wages of $55,000) and 200 indirect jobs (average annual wages of $40,000).  

Alcoa and Jobs

The Salisbury Post published an editorial today supporting our efforts to reach an agreement with Stanly County and bring hundreds of high-paying jobs to Stanly County. We agree that it's time to work together to bring 450 Clean Tech jobs to Stanly County. The other option -- a protracted legal battle and the loss of the Clean Tech jobs -- won't benefit anyone.

Read the editorial below.

Salisbury Post Editorial
Wednesday, September 14

Alcoa and Jobs

Alcoa and Stanly County commissioners still stand on opposite sides of the river when it comes to Alcoa's hydroelectric relicensing efforts, but at least they've been talking to one another. We'll take that as an encouraging sign.

The latest volley in the public relations battle over the relicensing centers on jobs. Alcoa, which is seeking federal approval to continue operating its Yadkin River hydroelectric dams, says securing the license is necessary to recruit new businesses and replace the jobs lost when the Badin smelting operations closed. Standing in the way, however, is Alcoa's inability to get a water quality certificate, which the state has refused to issue, citing mistatements on Alcoa's application. Stanly has sided with the state, which opposes renewal of Alcoa's federal license in hopes of taking over the Yadkin dams and using cheap electricity as its own industrial recruitment tool.

Meanwhile, caught in the middle of this power struggle are Stanly County citizens, who like those elsewhere could desperately use new jobs to help lower a double-digit unemployment rate. Their hopes were raised a few months ago when Alcoa announced that Electronic Recyclers International would move into the site of Alcoa's former smelting plant in Badin, starting with a workforce of 20-30 employees that is expected to reach 200. Now, Alcoa says another company, Clean Tech Silicon and Bar LLC, could bring in several hundred jobs and $300 million in investment. But in return, it apparently wants Stanly to drop its opposition to the water quality certification and relicensing effort. Stanly Commissioner Tony Dennis contends Alcoa is holding the promised jobs "hostage" as a way to put pressure on the county. Which is probably true to the same extent the state is holding the water certification "hostage" to gain leverage against Alcoa.

In reality, both Alcoa and its relicensing opponents have played hard ball at times. But with good jobs on the table, the need to get past the war of words becomes more urgent. The takeover attempt has lost momentum as North Carolina copes with the economic downturn. At this point, it's hard to fathom state or county officials pursuing what would no doubt be a protracted and costly court battle against Alcoa. While the details of negotiations between Stanly and Alcoa haven't been divulged, the fact they've discussed a deal suggests possible movement in this standoff.

With takeover of the dams a distant possibility at best, better to drive a hard bargain with Alcoa and gain jobs and other tangible benefits now than to continue pursuing a costly legal battle that doesn't create employment for anyone other than lawyers and lobbyists.